How ExxonMobil became a finance arm of the Republican
Party.
In late February, President Obama proposed, not for the first time, that
Congress end four billion dollars’ worth of subsidies for oil and gas
companies. He seemed to be signalling that he will be running for President
this year, as he did four years ago, in open opposition to the American oil
industry. The President’s policies toward the oil industry are not easy to
categorize. His actions—attacking oil-company profits while proposing more oil
drilling—can best be understood as political responses to rising gasoline
prices. The contest between the Democrats and Big Oil this year will be
reciprocal, and the other side will be led by ExxonMobil, by far the largest
and most profitable oil corporation headquartered in the U.S. In recent
election cycles, the corporation has directed more of its
political-action-committee spending to Republicans than any other of the
largest American public corporations. The evolution of the country’s biggest
and most powerful oil company into a finance arm of the Republican Party is a
story of both energy economics and style. ExxonMobil has developed an
algorithmic formula for political spending and lobbying that has reinforced its
alignment with Republican candidates. Exxon’s annual revenues, of four hundred
billion dollars, are about the same as the GDP of Norway. During the past
decade, as global oil prices have risen, ExxonMobil’s profits have smashed all
American records. The company’s headquarters are in Irving, Texas. Its Washington
office is in a pink granite-and-concrete building on K Street.
During
both the Bush and Obama Administrations, ExxonMobil has focused its PAC
donations on Republican legislators who can try to assure that no damaging laws
go through. The corporation has a notoriously bad reputation on climate issues.
ExxonMobil’s initial response to Obama’s ascendancy was to engage with
Democrats and search for common ground on climate policy. But the corporation
was constrained by the fact that most of its Democratic Party connections were
tied to the failing Presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.
During
the first three years of Obama’s Presidency, the corporation spent more than
fifty-two million dollars on lobbying in Washington, about fifty per cent more
than during the Bush Presidency.
When
Republicans took back the House in the 2010 midterm elections, ExxonMobil’s
lobbyists no longer had reason to fear that Obama or congressional Democrats
could upend their industry with climate or tax laws. All of the corporation’s
business strategies remain oriented toward the very long run. Decades from now,
oil, gas, and coal, ExxonMobil’s analysts predicted, “will continue to be the
most widely used fuels.” Steve Coll, the New Yorker
No comments:
Post a Comment