Arctic Sea Ice: 1880-2000
It does rough justice to a political ideology whose leading
advocates take wealth to be a sign of individual and social virtue, believe its
concentration in fewer and fewer hands isn’t something for a democratic country
to worry about, toy with the idea of getting rid of child-labor laws, regard
unemployment and other social insurance as forms of coddling the unworthy poor,
and hold health care to be a personal option for which the individual is
responsible. As Robert Reich (an economist for whom Obama never had much use) pointed out several months before the President used the
phrase last week, the social Darwinism of William Graham Sumner and other
late-nineteenth-century thinkers is alive and well in the current Republican
Party. -
That’s a picture only a social Darwinist could describe as
“an unprecedented success”—which is the phrase Congressman Paul Ryan, who
authored the Republican budget plan, uses to describe welfare reform. That
program was bipartisan, and widely popular. But today only leaders of the
Republican Party, like Ryan and Mitt Romney, believe it’s working so well that
the model should be extended to other government programs, including food
stamps and Medicaid. - more -George Packer - New Yorker
If that sounds too harsh, consider what Jason DeParle of the
Times reported two days ago. Even as the recession drove millions of
Americans deeper into poverty, many of them, mainly single mothers, continue to
be dropped from the welfare rolls under the welfare reform laws of the
nineteen-nineties. DeParle, the leading journalistic expert on the subject, did
not try to hide his indignation: “They have sold food stamps, sold blood,
skipped meals, shoplifted, doubled up with friends, scavenged trash bins for
bottles and cans and returned to relationships with violent partners—all with
children in tow.”
No comments:
Post a Comment